gun control controversy essays

write my philosophy admission essay

Post by Izzy Soleman » Tue Nov 15, pm. I am using share latex template to write my PhD thesis. The template has a default numerical citation style eg: Text sample [1]. The bibliography would then need to be in alphabetic order.

Gun control controversy essays resume for hospitality worker

Gun control controversy essays

ESL CRITICAL THINKING GHOSTWRITERS SITES CA

And too essay about best friend opinion you

What is wrong with this picture? Many years ago American citizens did not have to live in such danger as it is today, the government does nothing including NRA. Congress does nothing, sadly we live in a dangerous and volatile world and something needs to be done about this to prevent innocent children and adults from dangerous people who have guns in their hands the government should protect America from harm and danger!!!!

This helped me with my essay due. I wanted to do it on gun control, but I had no idea where to start. This really helped to develop my thesis statement and claim to turn in. Now I just have to write 8 pages on it. Custom Writing service experts You are not alone if you are experiencing difficulty selecting college essay topics! While many students appreciate the freedom of choosing a topic, most pupils depend on being provided college essay prompts. Many of these can be used Looking for a good argumentative topic for an essay or a research paper?

Of course, you could spend a couple more hours staring into the ceiling trying to come up with a brilliant topic for your next great persuasive or argumentative essay. Unlike other topics, persuasive topics are quite tricky… … What is a persuasive speech, after all? A persuasive speech on any topic is a Do you know the secret place where people go to get their good informative speech topics? Looking for an interesting topic for speech?

A proposal argument is a type of essay describing a specific issue that needs fixing. It focuses on the solutions to a problem. Are you interested in writing high-quality proposal essays? Wondering what makes a winning proposal essay? Here you will find answers to this question and brilliant proposal We use cookies to give you the best experience possible.

If you continue, we will assume that you agree to our Cookies Policy. Learn More. Arguments for gun control Arguments against gun control Guns make it easy to kill or injure a person, or even many people, in a short timeframe. Self-defense, hunting, and collecting are all legitimate purposes for owning a gun. Pro-gun radicalism and American fears.

Guns and fear often go hand in hand. Studies suggest that gun owners are more prone to phobias and distrust. The topic requires showing the irrational essence of gun ownership. Being pro-gun equals being anti-women. Firearms make domestic violence a lot more likely to end in death. Background checks are essential. The economic burden of firearms. This topic concerns the costs linked to gun-related injuries and deaths. These preventable expenditures strain the US economy. You can underline the necessity of gun control to alleviate the problem.

Gun control to protect schools from firearms. Schools are at the heart of the anti-gun movement. Meanwhile, gun control plays a vital role in preserving safety in educational facilities. An essay could communicate the intricate connection between the two.

Kids are not ok: pediatric gun-related injuries and deaths. Children often become victims of gun violence. The number of pediatric firearm-related injuries and deaths is disproportionate. Should parents remove all guns from their households to protect their kids? Rising gun deaths: a call for action. The high firearm-related death rate is a notorious problem. In the United States, the number is consistently above average. In this gun control argumentative essay, it becomes a reason for stricter gun policies.

Reducing firearm ownership is not decreasing civil liberties. The key reasoning is that gun ownership is not a universal human right. In this essay, you can explore the notion of civil liberties. Suicide and the availability of guns. Gun control topics are rarely concerned with suicide. You can show how stricter gun control would help reduce suicide rates.

More guns, more shootings: understanding gun control. This topic requires exploring the link between firearms and shootings. You can use gun ownership and mass shooting rates to prove your point. In this pro-gun control essay, statistical information is instrumental. Revision of the Second Amendment to prevent human tragedies. Firearm restrictions have economic consequences. Additional gun control measures are not free— they require more monetary resources.

Besides, stricter gun control deprives many citizens of firearm-related jobs. Firearm regulations deny the right to self-defense. Self-defense is a constitutional right granted by the Founding Fathers. When an attacker is armed, defensive gun use remains the only option. Gun control diminishes the capacity of citizens to protect themselves.

Crime is a colossal social challenge. It is vital to direct resources for crime prevention and management. Yet, gun control is not the ultimate solution to this problem. Gun control laws are not fruitful. One of the purposes of gun control is to curb the gun violence epidemic. Yet, whether it works or not is debatable.

The right to possess and carry guns is civil liberty. Gun ownership increases the sense of security. Besides, firearms perform an important psychological function. They give their owners a sense of safety, bringing emotional comfort. Gun control takes away the knowledge that one can protect oneself. Firearms black market: a bigger problem. Gun control will not prevent determined individuals from obtaining firearms.

Restricting access to legal guns could prompt people to buy weapons from black markets. Knives, hardware, and vehicles are lethal weapons, too. For instance, they frequently use cars as deadly weapons. Eliminating guns: an oversimplified approach. Gun control proponents often oversimplify the problem. Access to firearms is not the root cause of gun-related deaths and violence.

The phenomenon has multiple origins that you could examine. Disarming Americans kills their national identity. Guns are deeply ingrained in American culture and national identity. The right to bear them has a profound symbolic notion. Why gun control laws should be scrapped.

Gun control is not the answer — education is. Gun culture propaganda starts with cartoons. Gun control : why not ban everything that poses a potential threat? Firearm violence as a racial equity challenge. Studies have shown that some ethnicities are more likely to experience gun violence than others. African Americans, in particular, are affected by the issue. Your essay can investigate how firearm violence reflects and aggravates discrimination.

The relationship between mental health and mass shootings. Mental illness is the prime suspect as the root of gun violence. Researchers often consider it a determiner for mass shootings. Preventing and responding to firearm-related deaths. Each year, thousands of US citizens die due to gun violence. As the rate of firearm death rises, the issue becomes exponentially troubling. Decreasing the gun-related mortality rate is a topic of high priority.

The socio-economic roots of firearm violence. Gun violence has pronounced socio-economic causes. Low income and life in a deprived neighborhood are among the most significant risk factors. Examining how certain circumstances prompt gun violence is instrumental in alleviating the issue. Long-term psychological effects of gun violence.

Survivors and witnesses of gun violence experience grave psychological consequences, including PTSD and depression. Your essay can present gun violence as an extremely traumatic event. The contagion effect in mass shootings.

The contagion effect describes the spread of behavior. You can use it to explain the epidemic of gun violence. The topic requires you to look into the phenomenon. Intimate partner violence: the role of firearms. The severity of intimate partner violence is related to how accessible guns are to abusers. Many domestic homicides involve the use of weapons.

This gun ownership essay prompts to explain how firearms contribute to the phenomenon. Mass shootings and weapon availability. This topic prompts you to investigate the mass shootings aspect of gun violence. You could use quotes and statistics regarding gun laws to establish the connection. Gun violence: A poignant human rights issue. Firearm violence causes psychological, social, and financial harm.

Its victims suffer from long-term consequences in the form of mental disorders. Gun violence against women and girls. Firearms violence negatively impacts the life quality of women. Women and girls frequently become victims of gun attacks. Here, you could discuss how deep-seated misogyny contributes to the problem. School shootings : portrayal in media.

How can the government reduce firearm violence in low-income neighborhoods? Psychological consequences of school shootings. Fighting against gun violence: social activism. Major loopholes in gun laws. Federal and state laws are vulnerable to exploitation. It means they contain gaps endangering public safety. You can inspect it along with other deficiencies.

Gun laws : too strict or too weak? The harshness of gun laws is a debatable issue. Given the present gun violence epidemic, the answer might appear evident. Still, this topic encourages viewing the problem from multiple perspectives. Prohibiting the possession of assault weapons. Currently, there is no federal law prohibiting their ownership. Using such a weapon in a shooting increases mortality and traumatism.

The problem with private gun sales. Private firearms trade results in excessive gun accessibility. Private sellers are allowed to bypass crucial standards such as sales recordkeeping. The situation poses a threat to communal well-being. Mental illness in the context of firearms control legislation. In the context of gun laws, mental illness is a prominent notion.

The term and its usage in state and federal laws have nuances. You can interpret them in your essay. Using deadly force to defend property. Regarding the defense of private property, its use is not always justifiable.

This gun law essay proposes to reflect on the norms of firearm use. Nuances and limitations of the stand-your-ground law. The stand-your-ground law is the subject of heated debate. It most notably concerns the boundaries of gun use. Yet, knowing what is allowed is essential in self-defense. Gun laws give too much power to the government and way less from the people, which will lead to government corruption.

And, stated by ClearPictureOnline. We need to concentrate on the values and morals of our citizens and at the role the media plays in glorifying violence and the lack of respect for law. What people don 't understand is that they are taking away their own freedoms with Gun Control. Many gun advocates question how banning the use of guns for the civilians in U.

In reality,. Gun control is a very controversial topic in the United States, where the two main sides are the people opposed to gun control and the people in favor of gun control. It has become increasingly popular with the growing fear of terrorism, and how easy it is to attack the US.

People are divided on what they believe about whether gun control will help or not and it is sometimes hard to tell what statements are true. According to James Steinberg, a major portion of the problem is coming from the fact that gun control is a major issue in the United States. You would think that a weapon as deadly as an AR would not be so easily obtainable by average US Americans but here we are, letting people with a history of domestic violence get ahold of them.

When the weapons get into the hands of destructive monsters such as Nikolas Cruz and Adam Lanza, they hold responsibility for the actions that they choose to commit, even if it puts the people around them that risk. The correlation. Why Americans Need Guns The right to bear arms helps protect ourselves and our families. It is our constitutional right to bear arms and I believe it should not be taken away. Some people think if we did not have guns there would be less crime in the United States, but that is not true.

When a person purchases a gun at a store they have to register that gun in their name, unless they buy a used one from someone else. If guns are banned the government will take innocent civilian guns away, because they have them registered in their names.

From statistics like that it can be concluded that restricting gun control will make crimes more common. A few states have decided that gun control needs to be tightened and they found something surprising. Washington D. People argue that by limiting access to weapons and taking away the right to own firearms crime will go down. In places where that has been done it has not worked and most criminals state that they stole or had a family member supply them with their firearm Gun Control-Procon.

Gun control has been a heated debate for several decades, recently, the discussion surrounding this matter has intensified. The argument seems to be divided into liberal and conservative views, thoughts, and values. A majority of liberals desire stricter gun laws, required mental health check-ups, and longer waiting periods when it comes to purchasing a gun. However, the general census among the Republicans is less governmental interference because they feel that there is already too much governmental control involved.

The Republican Party often does not want stricter gun laws because the problem at hand is not the gun itself, but the individual wielding the gun. The history on the second amendment and gun control is that everyone has the right to bear arms but now it has been getting out of control with the mass shootings and how people can go online and purchase a gun illegally.

If a state does not accept the bear arms then the people do not have the right to bear arms and if. Concealed Weapons The gun laws and restrictions have become a very controversial topic in the world today. The people of the United States are nearly spilt on whether or not there should be stricter gun laws, but more people lean towards the stricter side of the line.

Many people question the assumption of whether citizens who carry have an affect on violent crimes. Whether than actually associating the crime with a person with or without a legal permit of a concealed weapon. Like this man they feel that they need to protect themselves before others decide to kill. Some people feel as though they have no choice but to carry a firearm because they feel as though they are in so much danger.

People should not have to buy a handgun because they are scared that is not the answer. Guns themselves are not responsible for crime; it is the peoples who are guilty for it and using gun for killing peoples.

Magnificent phrase sample formal letter resume very

Additional gun control measures are not free— they require more monetary resources. Besides, stricter gun control deprives many citizens of firearm-related jobs. Firearm regulations deny the right to self-defense. Self-defense is a constitutional right granted by the Founding Fathers. When an attacker is armed, defensive gun use remains the only option. Gun control diminishes the capacity of citizens to protect themselves.

Crime is a colossal social challenge. It is vital to direct resources for crime prevention and management. Yet, gun control is not the ultimate solution to this problem. Gun control laws are not fruitful. One of the purposes of gun control is to curb the gun violence epidemic. Yet, whether it works or not is debatable.

The right to possess and carry guns is civil liberty. Gun ownership increases the sense of security. Besides, firearms perform an important psychological function. They give their owners a sense of safety, bringing emotional comfort. Gun control takes away the knowledge that one can protect oneself.

Firearms black market: a bigger problem. Gun control will not prevent determined individuals from obtaining firearms. Restricting access to legal guns could prompt people to buy weapons from black markets. Knives, hardware, and vehicles are lethal weapons, too. For instance, they frequently use cars as deadly weapons.

Eliminating guns: an oversimplified approach. Gun control proponents often oversimplify the problem. Access to firearms is not the root cause of gun-related deaths and violence. The phenomenon has multiple origins that you could examine. Disarming Americans kills their national identity. Guns are deeply ingrained in American culture and national identity. The right to bear them has a profound symbolic notion.

Why gun control laws should be scrapped. Gun control is not the answer — education is. Gun culture propaganda starts with cartoons. Gun control : why not ban everything that poses a potential threat? Firearm violence as a racial equity challenge. Studies have shown that some ethnicities are more likely to experience gun violence than others. African Americans, in particular, are affected by the issue.

Your essay can investigate how firearm violence reflects and aggravates discrimination. The relationship between mental health and mass shootings. Mental illness is the prime suspect as the root of gun violence. Researchers often consider it a determiner for mass shootings. Preventing and responding to firearm-related deaths. Each year, thousands of US citizens die due to gun violence.

As the rate of firearm death rises, the issue becomes exponentially troubling. Decreasing the gun-related mortality rate is a topic of high priority. The socio-economic roots of firearm violence. Gun violence has pronounced socio-economic causes. Low income and life in a deprived neighborhood are among the most significant risk factors.

Examining how certain circumstances prompt gun violence is instrumental in alleviating the issue. Long-term psychological effects of gun violence. Survivors and witnesses of gun violence experience grave psychological consequences, including PTSD and depression. Your essay can present gun violence as an extremely traumatic event.

The contagion effect in mass shootings. The contagion effect describes the spread of behavior. You can use it to explain the epidemic of gun violence. The topic requires you to look into the phenomenon. Intimate partner violence: the role of firearms.

The severity of intimate partner violence is related to how accessible guns are to abusers. Many domestic homicides involve the use of weapons. This gun ownership essay prompts to explain how firearms contribute to the phenomenon. Mass shootings and weapon availability. This topic prompts you to investigate the mass shootings aspect of gun violence.

You could use quotes and statistics regarding gun laws to establish the connection. Gun violence: A poignant human rights issue. Firearm violence causes psychological, social, and financial harm. Its victims suffer from long-term consequences in the form of mental disorders.

Gun violence against women and girls. Firearms violence negatively impacts the life quality of women. Women and girls frequently become victims of gun attacks. Here, you could discuss how deep-seated misogyny contributes to the problem. School shootings : portrayal in media. How can the government reduce firearm violence in low-income neighborhoods? Psychological consequences of school shootings.

Fighting against gun violence: social activism. Major loopholes in gun laws. Federal and state laws are vulnerable to exploitation. It means they contain gaps endangering public safety. You can inspect it along with other deficiencies. Gun laws : too strict or too weak? The harshness of gun laws is a debatable issue.

Given the present gun violence epidemic, the answer might appear evident. Still, this topic encourages viewing the problem from multiple perspectives. Prohibiting the possession of assault weapons. Currently, there is no federal law prohibiting their ownership.

Using such a weapon in a shooting increases mortality and traumatism. The problem with private gun sales. Private firearms trade results in excessive gun accessibility. Private sellers are allowed to bypass crucial standards such as sales recordkeeping. The situation poses a threat to communal well-being. Mental illness in the context of firearms control legislation. In the context of gun laws, mental illness is a prominent notion. The term and its usage in state and federal laws have nuances.

You can interpret them in your essay. Using deadly force to defend property. Regarding the defense of private property, its use is not always justifiable. This gun law essay proposes to reflect on the norms of firearm use. Nuances and limitations of the stand-your-ground law. The stand-your-ground law is the subject of heated debate.

It most notably concerns the boundaries of gun use. Yet, knowing what is allowed is essential in self-defense. The need for federal registration laws. Although there is no national gun registry, its introduction could be beneficial. It would allow law enforcement agencies to track firearms more efficiently. In your essay, you could research other advantages of federal registration as well. Differences in gun laws at the state level.

Besides federal laws, each state has its own firearms policies. Federal and state regulations tend to vary considerably. It could be interesting to analyze how gun use and possession regulations differ from state to state. Buying guns without a background check: a dangerous loophole. Background checks are indispensable under federal law.

Still, a loophole makes it possible to sell firearms to incompetent and dangerous individuals. Say what could be done to make background checks more efficient. Are tougher gun laws a solution? Analyze gun laws in the state of Missouri. Gun ownership: gender, ethnicity, and class. The demographic portrait of a gun owner is a politically loaded subject. Despite the possible implications, it necessitates in-depth research. The racial element in American gun culture. Racism and gun control are more connected than might appear.

A range of opinions exists. Evaluating their interconnection might yield compelling results. In your essay, investigate American gun culture through the prism of racial inequality. Firearms ownership: do we need incentives or fees?

Gun ownership has several advantages, such as a sense of security. Nevertheless, its less positive effects could eclipse them. Discussing whether gun ownership should be discouraged or encouraged could help you write an engaging paper. The usage of firearms in self-defense. The efficacy and frequency of self-defense weapon use are essential for the gun control debate.

Analyzing these factors could help establish the validity of the argument. Gun ownership regulation: the Swiss example. In terms of firearm possession, Switzerland is a liberal country. It has lax laws regarding the acquisition and usage of guns. What can Switzerland teach the US about gun control?

The ethicality of firearm ownership. It is common to examine whether gun ownership is constitutional. Looking at its ethicality is a rarer approach. This controversial gun control essay topic helps to bridge the knowledge gap. Constitutional contradictions regarding gun rights. Whether gun rights are constitutional or unconstitutional is at the core of the debate. Do gun rights promote vigilantism?

Vigilante violence is a severe community challenge. A vengeful armed vigilante is a threat to their society. In your paper, investigate the role of gun rights in contributing to the problem. Preventing criminals from accessing guns. How effective is gun control in stopping gun violence? Contradictory opinions denying or supporting its productiveness need scrutiny. For this paper, you can use statistics and facts to clarify the situation.

The ideology behind gun control and rights. The gun control debate has long gone beyond objective arguments. By now, the problem entails larger political implications. Gun ownership or its absence strongly correlates with political behavior. Gun control as a measure against crime and gun violence.

Should the public use of guns remain legal? Gun control: Is it saving lives or narrowing freedoms? When gun deaths statistics for different countries were expressed as the number of gun deaths in a population of a million people, the United States was ranked below South Africa. The very idea of gun control goes against the US constitution that allows people the right to safeguard their lives. People need guns to defend themselves when being attacked by others. Additionally, firearms can provide a sense of comfort and security.

Since the Second Amendment upholds the right to gun ownership, it should not be restricted. It seems dangerous to start altering the constitution whenever we see fit. In doing so, we might create a precedent that others can use to promote more harmful agendas. Whether you are writing an argumentative, expository, research, or any other type of paper, the first thing to do is to define what gun control is.

So, if criminals are grimly determined to get a gun, they will do so, even if it is banned. Of course, you can bring a counter argument at once: if the responsible civilians can carry and own a firearm for purposes of self-defense, criminals will think twice before owning guns themselves. Obviously, if a criminal knows that every citizen may learn self-defense and can apply it practically even using a lethal force in an extreme situation.

Not only the police becomes a trouble on their way, criminals may be confronted by civilians that have broader democratic rights. Express the idea that it is important to remember that there are other types of weapon criminals may use. For instance, knives and other bladed articles are perfect examples. If a person is up to commit a crime and needs a weapon to carry it out, in some cases banning guns will not prevent that.

The other weapon is freely available, so a criminal may simply resort to some other tool. As a counter to the argument provided above, you are free to mention that there are types of crime that may be committed with the help of firearm only. For instance, there is hardly a bank robber that will use a knife against policemen that have guns.

This argument is related to a global political debate. If we consider the fact that people want to carry guns to be protected from government agents that may take away their democratic rights one by one until the citizens find themselves living in a police state. A police state means that the government can do anything, and the populace cannot resist being unarmed. Guns should be allowed because the government may take away the rights of its citizens and turn democracy into tyranny.

So, the only effective protection of citizens and their freedom of speech, religion, press and others are guns. Surely, in some countries citizens do not trust people who hold the highest positions in the government.